However, for Faist, his conveyance of emotion of Roger and his relationship with others seem genuine. I do not care about being genuine because nothing is really that genuine between a screen If the outcome is delivered with great quality, I'm satisfied. He can lead 90 minutes of work with brilliant chemistry with his co-stars. It's hidden in pinball and manifested through Roger's work and relationship. Message and theme are clear: taking a shot. The color palette and the costume are trendy and vintage at the same time. They contribute to the upbeat and witty atmosphere of the movie. Editing and the pace of the film are very up-to-date. Old Roger's narration in interview form and during the interaction with past Roger are the right amount of diversion to add more fun (and still be neat). Foremost, the story is well organized with clear plot development yet it's not simple.
#BEST PINBALL MACHINES KID AGE 4 TO 10 MOVIE#
Every element of the movie is doing its job.
It's just so wholesome and whole and complete. The best lowest budget film I've watched. I cannot believe 'Pinball: The Man Who Saved the Game' does not even have a wikipedia page. In any case, you get the just that it's a good movie, though not that it will necessarily blow your mind or change your life. I hesitated a long time between a 7 and an 8. Maybe it's the slight lack of originality in the "success story bioflick" genre that lowers the score for me, but then again, what they did with the material, they did really well, and the story is certainly worth a movie. Does it feel like one of the many "success story" films? Yes, it does. Are there flaws in the movie? None other than small clichés, etc. On top of it being a generally good movie, I don't really see what there is to say. There are some other clichés that were left unattended, but I guess that's okay. The movie includes a lot of small clichés, though makes fun of those clichés at the same time. What really makes the movie a lot better than what it would have been should it have had standard story telling, was self-derision, making fun of itself, correcting itself, and inserting historical snippets. Maybe like a 7.5? The acting is good, the story is solid and interesting (you even learn things, historical elements, etc.), the movie making is good, and there's awesome 70's styling.
0 kommentar(er)
